🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.